One Nation Under Treason
Congress, the Talmud, and the War Against Christ and the Constitution
by Ronald P. Bouchard Jr.
I. Introduction
This paper explores the lawful, historical, and moral arguments against recent congressional enactments that elevate sectarian religious codes, specifically Public Law 102-14 and the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2025. These acts constitute breaches of natural law, Christian common law, and the enumerated limits of the U.S. Constitution. Drawing from primary constitutional sources, the Law of Nations, early American legal charters, and scriptural authority, this paper affirms that such actions are void, ultra vires, and acts of treason.
As of current census data, individuals identifying as Jewish comprise approximately two percent of the U.S. population. Congress, whose sole lawful purpose is to secure the rights of the whole People, not a faction, has instead privileged the religious system of that small minority, one which explicitly rejects the divinity of Jesus Christ and, in Talmudic tradition, classifies His worship as idolatry. In so doing, Congress has betrayed both its moral neutrality and its lawful duty under Article I, Section 8, and the First Amendment.
The Preamble to the Constitution declares that all acts of government must “secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.” Elevating a foreign religious code that criminalizes Christian doctrine, especially when it cannot be justified by any express power in the Constitution, is not governance. It is usurpation. And it represents a fundamental breach of trust, jurisdiction, and the American compact itself.
II. Foundations of Constitutional and Natural Law Authority
The authority of the federal government is not inherent, it is delegated and limited. Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution grants Congress enumerated powers, none of which include defining religious orthodoxy, criminalizing theological dissent, or establishing a moral code rooted in any sectarian tradition.
The First Amendment prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. Article IV, Section 4 guarantees a Republican form of government. Article VI, Clause 3 forbids any religious test for office. Together, these provisions bar Congress from enacting, elevating, or enforcing religious codes, including those derived from foreign or Talmudic origin.
III. Christian Moral Foundations and Historical Proof
This nation’s founding was Christian in both spirit and law. The Mayflower Compact declared settlement for “the glory of God and advancement of the Christian faith.” The Fundamental Orders of Connecticut established government on “the Word of God.” The 1776 Delaware Constitution required all public officers to confess faith in “God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son.”
The Massachusetts Constitution (1780), Part I, Article III and the Virginia Declaration of Rights (1776), Article I, Section 16 codified the necessity of piety, Christian morality, and religious liberty as essential to civil order. These documents do not establish neutrality; they affirm the supremacy of God and the public utility of Christian doctrine.
In People v. Ruggles (1811), the court upheld that blasphemy against Jesus Christ was a punishable offense in alignment with the Christian common law foundation of the state.
IV. The Law of Nations and the Inviolability of Foundational Law
Emer de Vattel, whose work The Law of Nations was heavily relied upon by the founders, states:
“The fundamental laws of a nation are sacred… the legislator cannot change them.” (Law of Nations, Book I, §§10–13)
This principle affirms that no branch of government, legislative, executive, or judicial, possesses authority to overturn the foundational moral and constitutional framework of the nation. Acts that seek to establish new moral codes, suppress conscience, or impose foreign doctrines are not merely legislative errors, they are capital breaches of public trust.
V. The Binding Nature of Oaths and Office
According to Numbers 30:2, “If a man vow a vow unto the Lord, or swear an oath to bind his soul with a bond; he shall not break his word.” The Constitution requires every member of Congress to swear an oath to support it (Article VI). That oath binds them not only to the text, but to the moral law underpinning it, the law of nature and nature’s God.
Scripture affirms throughout: oaths to God are binding. In Joshua 9:20, Israel honored an oath even when it was made under false pretenses, “lest wrath be upon us, because of the oath.” In Judges 11:30–36, Jephthah upholds a vow to the Lord at great cost. And in 2 Samuel 15:7–9, Absalom insists on fulfilling a vow to God in Hebron.
It is immaterial whether their outward words align with inward deeds. By holding office, they occupy a position of public trust and must act in conformity with that trust, or be considered in rebellion to it. A Congress that sits in power yet defies its oath to God and the Constitution commits perjury before heaven.
VI. Babylonian Origins and Spiritual Symbolism
The recognition of the Babylonian Talmud as a moral authority introduces not only a legal crisis but a spiritual one. Scripture identifies Babylon as the seat of rebellion, confusion, and oppression. Revelation 17 portrays Babylon as “the Mother of Harlots,” the symbolic seat of religious and political apostasy:
“Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth… drunk with the blood of the saints.” (Revelation 17:5–6)
To elevate laws developed in Babylon and use them to suppress the Gospel is to fulfill this prophecy in the civic realm. It symbolizes not merely legislative error, but spiritual betrayal.
Scripture further warns in 2 Kings 17:19–20 that Judah “walked in the statutes of Israel which they made,” and God “rejected all the seed of Israel… and delivered them into the hand of spoilers.”
Leviticus 18:3 commands: “After the doings of the land of Egypt… shall ye not do… neither shall ye walk in their ordinances.” Micah 6:16 affirms: “The statutes of Omri are kept… that I should make thee a desolation.”
America cannot walk in foreign statutes and expect to be spared the judgment that fell upon Israel.
VII. Duty of the Church and the People
The Church has never been called to passive observance in the face of tyranny. Throughout Scripture and history, it is the people of God who stood as a wall against kings, empires, and councils that rose up against the name of the Lord.
In our time, this duty remains unchanged. When law is perverted, when rights are trampled, and when Christ is silenced by statute, it becomes the solemn obligation of every pastor, elder, and citizen to reject silence and resist subversion.
To delay is to concede. To remain neutral is to surrender.
“Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed.” , Isaiah 10:1
“We ought to obey God rather than men.” — Acts 5:29
VIII. Clarifying the Limits of Religious Liberty in Law
The arguments presented in this paper do not oppose religious freedom; they uphold it. As Frédéric Bastiat explained in The Law, “the law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense.” That defense includes the right of conscience, belief, and private religious practice. What the law must not do, Bastiat warned, is pervert itself by becoming “the weapon of injustice.”
The Antisemitism Awareness Act and Public Law 102-14 are not protections of private belief, they are elevations of sectarian doctrine into public policy, in direct violation of the law’s purpose. As Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense, “government even in its best state is but a necessary evil,” and its only lawful object is to secure liberty, not to define moral orthodoxy.
Emer de Vattel likewise insisted that the fundamental law of a nation cannot be replaced by imported customs or clerical codes. Sovereignty belongs to the people, and their liberty cannot be surrendered by the legislature to any priesthood, foreign or domestic.
Thus, this paper distinguishes between protected private religion, which is sacred, and public imposition of religious law, which is forbidden. Vattel affirms in The Law of Nations that when legislators act contrary to a nation’s fundamental laws, particularly those ordained to preserve liberty, they commit a capital offense against society itself. These are not mere technical infractions; they are crimes that destroy the legitimacy of government. Sovereignty belongs to the people, and no branch of government may surrender it under color of law. To do so is not piety. It is tyranny.
IX. Conclusion
Public Law 102-14, the Antisemitism Awareness Act of 2025, and any similar enactments are void ab initio, ultra vires, and repugnant to natural law, Christian common law, and the supreme law of the Constitution. But the violation is more than a legislative error; it is a spiritual and foundational betrayal.
According to John Locke in his Second Treatise of Government, when a legislature acts against the trust of the people and violates the fundamental laws for which it was instituted, it ceases to be a legislature. It becomes a faction of usurpers.
Scripture affirms the same:
“It is time for thee, LORD, to work, for they have made void thy law.” (Psalm 119:126)
This Congress has not merely misstepped. It has committed the most egregious act imaginable, it has raised a foreign religious code above Christ and attempted to suppress His name in the land established for His glory. That is not just unlawful. It is blasphemy.
A legislature that enacts such law is no longer our legislature. It has declared war on the Constitution, on the people, and on the Lord of nations. It must be lawfully repudiated, and the true authority of the people restored.
“Be wise now therefore, O ye kings: be instructed, ye judges of the earth.
Serve the Lord with fear… Kiss the Son, lest he be angry, and ye perish from the way.” –Psalm 2:10–12
Absolutely correct. Where are we assembling Committees of Safety to function as our grand juries?
This is a rogue and treasonous government, and the ignorance combined with intentional destruction of God, Our enumerated rights and the Constitution has escalated to a point where we the people must in unison act to restore OUR GOD GIVEN RIGHTS !
This article should be a notice as well. It’s spot on!