COMMON LAW ACADEMY RED
Law and Discourse Series
Today, we embark on a new path with the ‘Law and Discourse’ series (red). This series is designed to be more interactive and solution-oriented. While the ‘Fundamental Principles’ series (green) was about learning the law, ‘Law and Discourse’ is about applying that knowledge. Together, we will use what we have learned to identify instances where government actions need correction. More importantly, you will actively participate in creating and executing plans to address these issues.
Our sessions will be dynamic, involving discussions, breakout groups, and expert panels. We will work collaboratively to develop actionable solutions and strategies. Your insights, experiences, and ideas will be invaluable as we navigate through these discussions.
Thank you for joining us on this new venture. Let’s get started on making a real impact!”
WEDNESDAYS
7:00 PM EST
meetn.com/cla
Or, dial this U.S. number
+1-540-202-2235 PIN:27892
p.s. International dial-in numbers are available at https://meetn.com/Numbers
Meetn® is the Faster, Easier, and More Customizable Alternative to Zoom®
Lesson 101: Authority Under Scrutiny-People v. Government
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these two questions:
1. Thomas Massie Asked U.S. Attorney General, Merrick Garland, “By What Authority was Jack Smith appointed as Independent Counsel or “By What Authority was the office created?”
What is the answer?
and
2. All of mankind are equally entitled to the free exercise of religion, in the manner and season most agreeable to the dictates of his/her own conscience?
Who gets to question your conscience? Is conscience limited to religious conscience?
Lesson 102: "Liberty of Conscience" and the Protection of Children
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these three questions:
1.Who has the right to “liberty of conscience” in America?
2. Is it unconstitutional to promote and condone LGBTQ+ ideologies in school?
3. Marjorie Taylor Greene introduced bill H.R. 1399- “Protect Children’s Innocence Act”. Why is the bill defective?
Episode 103: The Seismic Shift: The Supreme Court's Recent Rulings and Declaration of Incapacity to the President
In today’s Law and Discourse Discussion we tackle these three questions:
- How does SEC v. Jarkesy and the weakening of the Chevron doctrine affect administrative proceedings?
- In Trump v. United States the court ruled that sitting presidents could be shielded from certain legal actions related to their official duties. Which, many people argue allows presidents to act with impunity. Are they right?
- During the presidential debate on June 27, Biden’s cognitive decline was undeniable evident Proving to all who watched, his unfitness for the presidency. What can be done about it?
